Jurisdictional Announcements

23 September 2024 – Definition of “Waters of the United States” – Rule Status and Litigation Update
9/24/2024
On December 30, 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of the Army (“the agencies”) announced the final "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'" rule. On...
8 September 2023 - EPA and the Army Issue Final Rule to Amend 2023 Rule
9/8/2023
On August 29, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of the Army (the agencies) issued a final rule to amend the final “Revised Definition of ‘Waters of the United...
27 June 2023 - UPDATE Supreme Court Ruling in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
6/27/2023
The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of the Army (agencies) are in receipt of the U.S. Supreme Court's May 25, 2023, decision in the case of Sackett v. Environmental Protection...

Jurisdictional Determinations By District

Great Lakes & Ohio River Division

  • Buffalo District 
  • Chicago District 
  • Detroit District 
  • Huntington District 
  • Louisville District 
  • Nashville District 
  • Pittsburgh District 
  • All District regulatory information can be found at the Great Lakes & Ohio River Division website, linked above.

Mississippi Valley Division               

 North Atlantic Division

Southwestern Division 

Northwestern Division

Pacific Ocean Division 

South Atlantic Division 

South Pacific Division 

Current RGL on Jurisdictional Determinations

Collapse All Expand All

2023 Rule, as amended - Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States" (Operative in 24 States)

Collapse All Expand All
 2023 Rule, as amended – Revised Definition of "Waters of the United States"
 Guidance Documents and Memoranda Used to Implement the Definition of "Waters of the United States"

The guidance documents and memoranda listed below are being used to implement the final "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'" rule, which was published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023, and took effect on March 20, 2023, as amended by the conforming rule which took effect of September 8, 2023, consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. EPA. However, this rule is not currently operative in certain states and for certain parties due to litigation. Where the rule is not operative, "waters of the United States" is interpreted consistent with the regulatory regime in place prior to 2015, consistent with the Sackett decision. Please visit EPA’s Rule Status page for additional information about the status of the January 2023 Rule, as amended, and litigation. 

Approved jurisdictional determinations (JDs) are case-specific determinations based on the record, and factual questions or Sackett concerns may be raised in the context of a particular approved JD. For each of the regulatory regimes (the January 2023 Rule, as amended, and the pre-2015 regime) under which the Corps is issuing approved JDs, EPA and the Corps (“the agencies”) signed and posted a joint coordination memorandum that established a process by which the agencies will coordinate on Clean Water Act geographic jurisdictional matters to ensure accurate and consistent implementation of the operative regime (see web links below). For draft approved JDs that are elevated to the Headquarters level for review, a memorandum may be issued that provides policy guidance to the respective EPA regional and Corps district offices. The agencies are posting those memoranda on the web to ensure transparency and accessibility to the public. Memoranda providing policy guidance for draft approved JDs completed under the January 2023 Rule, as amended, are posted on this web page below.

The Clean Water Act and EPA and Corps regulations, interpreted consistent with the Sackett decision, contain legally binding requirements. The guidance documents and memoranda listed below do not substitute for those provisions or regulations, nor are they regulations themselves. Thus, the guidance documents and memoranda do not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, the Corps, Tribes, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances.

 Headquarters Field Memos Implementing the 2023 Rule, As Amended

Pre-2015 WOTUS Regulatory Regime (Operative in 26 States)

Collapse All Expand All
 Select Documents Used to Implement the Pre-2015 Definition of “Waters of the United States"

The agencies utilized the materials listed below in implementing the pre-2015 regulatory regime. In light of litigation, the agencies are interpreting "waters of the United States" consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in certain states and for certain parties until further notice. Additionally, and as explained above, the agencies will interpret the phrase “waters of the United States” consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett. Thus, certain aspects of the documents listed below may no longer be in effect. Please visit EPA’s Rule Status page for additional information about the status of the January 2023 Rule, as amended, and litigation.

Approved jurisdictional determinations (JDs) are case-specific determinations based on the record, and factual questions or Sackett concerns may be raised in the context of a particular approved JD. For each of the regulatory regimes (the January 2023 Rule, as amended, and the pre-2015 regime) under which the Corps is issuing approved JDs, EPA and the Corps (“the agencies”) signed and posted a joint coordination memorandum that established a process by which the agencies will coordinate on Clean Water Act geographic jurisdictional matters to ensure accurate and consistent implementation of the operative regime (see web links below). For draft approved JDs that are elevated to the Headquarters level for review, a memorandum may be issued that provides policy guidance to the respective EPA regional and Corps district offices. The agencies are posting those memoranda on the web to ensure transparency and accessibility to the public. Memoranda providing policy guidance for draft approved JDs completed under the pre-2015 regulatory regime are posted on this web page below.

The Clean Water Act and EPA and Corps regulations, interpreted consistent with the Sackett decision, contain legally binding requirements. The guidance documents and memoranda listed below do not substitute for those provisions or regulations, nor are they regulations themselves. Thus, the guidance documents and memoranda do not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, the Corps, Tribes, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances.

 Headquarters Field Memos Implementing the Pre-2015 Regulatory Regime Consistent With Sackett
 Rapanos/Carabell
 SWANCC - Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. USACE (2001)
  • 2003 SWANCC Guidance - Guidance clarifying the Supreme Court’s decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. USACE (2001) and federal regulation of "navigable waters".